Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 February 2009
Published in Agron J 101:269-277 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0168
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kyveryga, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kyveryga, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kyveryga, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Spatial Variability
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis

SPATIAL VARIABILITY

Characterizing and Classifying Variability in Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization on Subfield and Field Scales

P. M. Kyverygaa,*, A. M. Blackmerb and J. Zhangc

a On-Farm Network, Iowa Soybean Association, 4554 114th Street, Urbandale, IA 50322
b Dep. of. Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
c Statistical Consulting Center, Wright State Univ., 130 MM Bldg., 3640 Colonel Glenn HWY, Dayton, OH 45435

* Corresponding author (pkyveryga{at}iasoybeans.com).

Marked spatial and temporal variability in yield response to N fertilizer observed in individual yield response trials creates a high degree of uncertainty when estimating economic optimum rates (EORs) of N for a group of trials and when extrapolating these rates from one location to another. A survey was conducted to characterize and classify variability in yield response to N on subfield and field scales. Fertilizer N was applied at five rates (56, 84, 112, 140, and 168 kg N ha–1) in many (6–12) replicated strips within three 18- to 24-ha no-till fields during two corn (Zea mays L.) growing seasons. Yield responses or yield differences between two adjacent strips were measured in 22 to 25 grid cells ha–1 within each field. Cumulative probability distributions (CPDs) were used to estimate the probability that a given N rate produces a yield response less or equal to a specified quantity. The yield responses were classified into potential categories with different N fertilizer requirements using apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa), digital soil map units, and relative elevation. Analysis indicated that the classifications explained <3% variability in yield response to N applied in the near-optimal range, where probabilities of receiving positive and negative marginal returns were the same. Presenting probabilities of yield response observed at different ranges of N fertilization may provide the basis for assessing the uncertainty associated with the variable effects of weather and variable supply of N when assessing economic risk and benefits of N fertilization in large-scale on-farm studies.

Abbreviations: CPD, cumulative probability distribution • CI, confidence interval • ECa, apparent soil electrical conductivity • EOR, economic optimum rate

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication May 16, 2008.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.